A. Mohy, A.; Bassioni, H. A.; Elgendi, E. O. and Hassan, T. M. (2026) Modeling spatiotemporal hazard dynamics for construction safety using graph attention networks. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose – This study aims to address the limitations of lagging indicators and static risk assessments by developing an automated framework to model the dynamic nature of construction accident causation. The objective is to transition safety management from reactive compliance to predictive risk mitigation by forecasting how hazards propagate across construction sites over time. Design/methodology/approach – The framework uses construction incident reports from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration database. The methodology begins by applying natural language processing and semantic clustering to define a validated hazard taxonomy from unstructured narratives. Next, a temporal graph is constructed to model hazard co-occurrences within a 30-day metropolitan window. Finally, edge-aware Graph Neural Networks, including GraphSAGE, graph attention network, Graph Convolutional Network and Graph Isomorphism Network, are used to formulate hazard forecasting as a link prediction task. Findings – The GraphSAGE architecture equipped with convolutional block attention module attention yielded the highest predictive performance (mean reciprocal rank = 0.537), outperforming baseline models. Temporal features were identified as the primary driver of predictability, outweighing static structural associations. The model successfully mapped high-probability hazard chains, such as the progression from demolition to structural and struck-by incidents. Practical implications – The predictive framework enables safety managers, regulators and planners to anticipate imminent risks and deploy targeted interventions, optimizing resource allocation and site inspection schedules before sequential accidents occur. Originality/value – This research provides an end-to-end framework that transforms unstructured text into a dynamic temporal graph. It offers a data-driven tool for forecasting regional hazard pathways, empirically validating theories that treat safety risk as a dynamic property of temporal alignment.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accident analysis; automation; construction safety; graph neural networks; hazard prediction; link prediction; natural language processing; temporal graph |
| Index terms: | neural network, safety management, risk mitigation, manager, modelling, regulator, clustering, construction accident, forecasting, construction site, narrative, module, taxonomy, methodology, compliance, resource allocation, automation, risk assessment, occupational safety and health, dynamics, database, window, planner, inspection, construction incident, construction safety |
| Subjects: | resource management, data analysis and analytics, analytical methods, artificial intelligence, automation and robotics, environmental health, research methods, systems engineering, data management, sociology, practitioner, architectural elements, occupational health and safety management, health risk and incident analysis, data science, quality assurance, qualitative and interpretive research, profession, health safety and environment, financial risk, prediction and forecasting, work location |
| Topics: | Site Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Quality Management, Sustainability, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Cost Management, Digital Applications, Stakeholder Management, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here