Garba, A; Kishk, M and Moore, D R (2016) A comparative study of biomass energy technologies for sustainable electricity in Nigerian rural areas. In: Chan, P W and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 32nd Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2016, Manchester, UK.
Abstract
Biomass energy source remains one of the means of providing sustainable electricity to rural areas in developing countries. As a result of dwindling power generation and supply in Nigeria representing between 10 to 34%, the rural communities are mostly affected in their socio-economic activities. Considering the vast biomass resources in Nigerian rural areas, it is feasible to provide sustainable electricity to these communities through Biomass Energy Technologies (BET)-thermo-chemical and biological. However, cost has been found to be a major constraint in adopting RETs. The research aims to assess the economics of BET in generating sustainable electricity in Nigerian rural areas. Whole Life Costing (WLC) approach has been used to evaluate and optimise various capacities of BET; associated cost and revenue have been collected from manufacturers, field survey and financial institutions. The findings reveal that cost/kW of system capacities between 200kW to 10kW for gasification, combustion and biogas technologies range between US$594-US$1,280, US$1,427-US$2,249 and US$3,614-US4,602 respectively. The WLC/kWh of generating electricity from the same set of technologies and in order of system capacities above, under different operational hours (8, 10, 12 and 16), without and with Feed-in-Tariff (FIT) incentives ranges between US$0.015-US$0.11, US$0.041-US$0.37 and US$0.025-US$0.135. All gasification scenarios calculated except 8 operational hours without FIT at 10kW capacity are cost competitive with existing fossil fuel source used in generating electricity in the country at US$0.083. Direct combustion (150kW) and Biogas (100Kw) capacities are the only cost competitive scenarios with FF source without FIT at the moment. In the event fuel price increases between 50-100%, WLC/kWh of majority of all scenarios will exceed the existing unit cost of electricity in the country accordingly. Hence, incentives provision will play a greater role in encouraging investors' participation. This is the second paper of my PhD program for ARCOM conference
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | biomass energy technologies; Nigeria; sustainable electricity; whole life costing |
| Index terms: | energy source, survey, Nigeria, economic activity, revenue, fossil fuel, whole-life costing, rural area, comparative study, unit cost, power generation, conference, program, investor, manufacturer, energy technology, biogas, developing country |
| Subjects: | land use and regional development, software systems, energy systems, research dissemination and communication, sociology, Geography, economic analysis, practitioner, financial and cost management, innovation and technology management, occupational health, research design and methodology, development economics, data collection methods |
| Topics: | International Construction, Urban Studies, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here