Applying Maslow's hierarchy of needs in assessing mental ill-health risk factors of construction employees: A case study in Vietnam

Le, D. T.; Nguyen, M. V.; Tran, V. T.; Le-Hoai, L. and Nguyen Pham, N. D. (2026) Applying Maslow's hierarchy of needs in assessing mental ill-health risk factors of construction employees: A case study in Vietnam. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 24(6), pp. 1435-1459. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose – Construction employees face numerous mental ill health risk factors. However, little is known about the importance of these factors. This study aims to identify and prioritize the mental ill-health risk factors of construction employees by applying Maslow's hierarchy of needs as a theoretical framework. Design/methodology/approach – A list of 22 risk factors was identified via a review of previous studies and discussions with experienced practitioners. A structured questionnaire survey was then developed and delivered to 422 construction employees in Vietnam using the snowball sampling method. Data were analyzed using the fuzzy synthetic evaluation method. Findings – The results reveal that physiological needs, esteem needs and self-actualization are the top three priorities for construction employees. In contrast, safety needs and social belonging needs were ranked lower. Originality/value – This study demonstrates the applicability of Maslow's hierarchy of needs as a suitable framework for examining mental ill-health risk factors in the construction context. The results show a different prioritization of these risk factors from the original ordering of needs proposed by Maslow. The findings offer practical value by informing the prioritization of mental health interventions in the construction environment.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction employees; fuzzy synthetic evaluation; maslow's hierarchy of needs; mental ill health; risk factors
Index terms: mental health, sampling, construction employee, face, methodology, fuzzy synthetic evaluation, health risk, questionnaire, survey, practitioner, Vietnam, case study, risk factor
Subjects: research methods, decision-making and optimization, psychology, practitioner, Geography, environmental hazards, health conditions and diseases, environmental health, data collection methods
Topics: Sustainability, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here