Li, Q.; Jin, F.; Guo, C.; Sun, D. and Chong, H. Y. (2026) How to identify high-value innovations? A perspective from construction engineering patents' knowledge graphs. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, pp. 1-20. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – To enhance the early prediction of high-value innovations in the construction engineering domain by addressing the limitations of existing approaches that overlook semantic and relational features embedded in patent data. Design/methodology/approach – This paper constructs a multidimensional predictive indicator system by integrating structural features with network relationships into a unified semantic framework of a patent knowledge graph in the construction engineering domain. An improved TF-IDF algorithm is applied to extract key technologies, while knowledge graph embedding techniques are used to capture latent relational features. Finally, machine learning classifiers are employed to predict patent value. Findings – The results indicate that combining patent text features with knowledge graph embedding features significantly enhances prediction performance. The model achieves an AUC exceeding 80%, representing an improvement of approximately 7% compared with models relying solely on external features. Additionally, the patent technology coverage and novelty features extracted from the patent text play a significant role in value prediction. Originality/value – This research integrates semantic, structural, and relational features within a knowledge graph-based approach for the early identification of high-value innovations. It highlights the theoretical role of relational networks and offers interpretive insights to inform innovation evaluation, serving as an empirical reference for R&D and policy analysis.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction engineering innovation; high-value patent; knowledge graph; machine learning |
| Index terms: | policy analysis, machine learning, methodology, high-value, construction engineering |
| Subjects: | engineering methods, artificial intelligence, economic analysis, policy studies, research methods |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Governance, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here