Ozorhon, B. and Karakurt, C. (2026) Navigating retail construction projects in Türkiye: Critical enablers and barriers. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, pp. 1-20. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – Retail construction projects operate under fast-track, brand-sensitive, and operationally constrained conditions that are not fully captured by traditional construction management frameworks. This study identifies and evaluates the critical enablers and barriers influencing project success and addresses the lack of integrated approaches linking these factors. Design/methodology/approach – Empirical data were collected through a structured questionnaire administered to 82 professionals across retail, design, and construction domains. A total of 17 enablers and 13 barriers were assessed using a five-point Likert scale and analyzed through descriptive statistics and ANOVA. The factors were grouped into three domains: Strategic and Organizational, Human Capital and Collaboration, and Operational Integration and Innovation. Findings – Results reveal a clear symmetry between key enablers and corresponding barriers, indicating that underlying project capabilities can drive success or failure. Leadership competence and project planning emerged as the most critical enablers, while ineffective communication and coordination were the most significant barriers. Technical expertise, contractor performance, and supply chain efficiency strongly influence outcomes. An innovation-execution gap was also identified, with digital and continuous improvement practices remaining underutilized. Research limitations/implications – This study is limited by its cross-sectional, perception-based survey design and its focus on professionals primarily located in Turkey. Consequently, findings may not fully capture longitudinal trends or reflect conditions in regions with differing regulatory or economic environments. Future research could apply causal and comparative methods, including regression or structural equation modelling, to examine interdependencies among enablers and barriers. Expanding geographic coverage and incorporating objective project performance metrics would enhance generalizability. Longitudinal and qualitative investigations could further validate the dual enabler–barrier framework and explore how innovation and digitalization evolve throughout retail project lifecycles. Practical implications – The findings offer a clear roadmap for practitioners to improve retail construction performance. Strengthening leadership and strategic oversight ensures alignment with corporate goals, while early-stage planning and feasibility analysis reduce disruptions. Investing in technical skills, cross-functional collaboration, and communication enhances coordination and problem-solving. Operationally, reinforcing contractor performance, supply-chain efficiency, and standardized design practices promotes delivery speed and quality. Encouraging technology adoption, feedback mechanisms, and continuous improvement institutionalizes learning and resilience. These measures collectively enable firms to balance cost, time, and brand experience objectives, achieving faster rollouts and greater consistency across multi-site retail portfolios. Social implications – Improved retail construction practices contribute positively to society by supporting efficient urban development, sustainable resource use, and enhanced consumer environments. Effective leadership, collaboration, and innovation reduce waste, minimize disruption to communities during build phases, and improve safety and working conditions. Embedding sustainability principles and digital feedback loops fosters accountability and environmental responsibility within supply chains. As retail spaces remain key social and economic hubs, successful project delivery strengthens local employment, accessibility, and inclusivity. The sector's transition toward agile, technology-enabled construction thereby promotes social well-being through better-designed, resilient, and community-oriented built environments. Originality/value – The study advances Critical Success Factor (CSF) theory by introducing a dual-structure enabler–barrier framework that conceptualizes project perf rmance as the interaction between enabling and constraining factors. It provides a retail-specific perspective and a practical diagnostic tool to improve project delivery, customer experience, and innovation-driven outcomes.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | critical success factors; cross-functional collaboration; project management; retail construction |
| Index terms: | urban development, questionnaire, survey, continuous improvement, Likert scale, accessibility, practitioner, society, Turkey, critical success factor, project performance, project planning, design practice, statistics, project success, coordination, employment, efficiency, feedback loop, digitalization, built environment, leadership competence, traditional construction, methodology, interaction, well-being, integrated approach, retail project, collaboration, technology adoption, project delivery, lifecycle, strengthening, accountability, technical skill, integration, human capital, working conditions, project management, contractor performance, investigation, structural equation modelling, retail construction |
| Subjects: | economics, research methods, heritage and conservation, inclusive design, employment law, project delivery, mental health and wellbeing, management, contractual arrangements, mathematical modelling, liability law, control systems, structural engineering, performance measurement, organizational analysis, urban design, contract management, statistical analysis, construction type, leadership, practitioner, Geography, digital technology, professional development, behavioral psychology, project management theory and practice, data collection methods, performance management, innovation and technology management, building construction, infrastructure and transport systems, communities and social development, design process |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Roles and Professions, Urban Studies, Geographical Context, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Health and Safety, Stakeholder Management, Organizational Design, Project Management, Procurement, Research Practice, Legal Issues, Information Management, Quality Management, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here