Albagoury, S. H. and AbdelMaksoud, K. M. (2026) Integrating socio-economic impact assessment into the reconstruction plan for Derna, Libya. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, pp. 1-13. ISSN 1759-5908
Abstract
Purpose – This study aims to examine the socio-economic impacts of the 2023 Derna floods in Libya and evaluates the cost-benefit implications of the subsequent reconstruction decisions, with the aim of identifying systemic failures that perpetuate disaster-reconstruction-vulnerability cycles in climatically vulnerable regions. Design/methodology/approach – Using a qualitative, descriptive methodology, the research analyzes secondary data drawn from international organizations – including the World Bank and the World Health Organization – to assess the multidimensional consequences of this catastrophic event across urban planning, hydrology and disaster risk management dimensions. Findings – Storm Daniel exposed critical vulnerabilities in Mediterranean arid and semi-arid regions, where traditional flood paradigms have evolved into cascading phenomena intensified by antecedent heatwaves. Derna's catastrophic flooding resulted from fundamental urban planning failures, specifically the city's positioning within floodplains without adequate risk mitigation infrastructure. Despite the substantial financial and social costs incurred, the 2024 reconstruction reproduced the same vulnerable spatial configuration without implementing comprehensive flood management systems or alternative planning frameworks, thereby perpetuating identical hazardous conditions and rendering early warning systems insufficient as standalone solutions. The study further identifies significant knowledge gaps in the hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydroclimatology of flooding in arid regions, compounded by limited observational data and inadequate hydrological modeling capabilities. Practical implications – This study offers critical practical implications for disaster management and urban planning in vulnerable regions. It highlights the urgent need to move beyond reactive reconstruction toward proactive, comprehensive spatial planning that incorporates region-specific flood risk assessments. Practical steps include strategic relocation of communities from floodplains, implementing robust flood management systems and developing alternative planning frameworks. It emphasizes integrating lessons from catastrophic events into future reconstruction to break the "disaster-reconstruction-vulnerability" cycle, ensuring sustainable resilience in climatically susceptible areas. Social implications – The perpetuation of vulnerable spatial configurations in Derna has severe social implications. It places communities at constant risk of displacement, injury and loss of life, causing widespread trauma and psychological distress. The repeated cycle of disaster and inadequate reconstruction erodes public trust in authorities and hinders long-term community recovery. Furthermore, it disproportionately affects the most vulnerable populations, exacerbating existing inequalities in access to housing, healthcare, education and livelihoods, creating a precarious and unstable social environment. Originality/value – This study contributes original insights by demonstrating the economic inefficiency of reactive disaster management approaches and underscoring that sustainable resilience requires comprehensive spatial planning, strategic relocation of vulnerable communities and region-specific risk assessment frameworks. The Derna case serves as a critical reference for integrating lessons learned from catastrophic events into reconstruction planning, offering a replicable analytical framework for similarly exposed arid-region urban context (graphical abstract).
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | climate change; Derna floods; disaster reconstruction; flood risk management; Libya; socio-economic impacts |
| Index terms: | housing, risk mitigation, flooding, international organization, modelling, population, spatial configuration, flood risk management, reconstruction, spatial planning, recovery, climate change, injury, inequality, arid regions, secondary data, psychological distress, paradigm, methodology, management system, dimension, disaster management, analytical framework, risk assessment, Libya, early warning, lessons learned, urban planning, disaster risk, hydrology, socio-economic impact, heatwave, relocation, World Bank, vulnerability |
| Subjects: | climate science, financial risk, architectural design, urban design, institutional frameworks, economic and policy analysis, management, research methods, strategic management, operations management, data collection methods, building construction, market analysis, education and knowledge transfer, physical geography and landforms, environmental hazards, health conditions and diseases, data analysis and analytics, analytical methods, urban planning, professional development, demography, construction type, health monitoring assessment and metrics, sociology, Geography, water management |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Urban Studies, Cost Management, Governance, Ethics, Design Practice, Sustainability, International Construction, Construction Technology, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Organizational Design, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here