Deng, L. and Zu, F. (2026) Promoting public housing development on private land: The case of Hong Kong. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, pp. 1-24. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – To promote the public housing development on private land based on the Land Sharing Pilot Scheme (LSPS) in Hong Kong, this study develops a multi-objective optimization (MOO) model to optimize the land use allocation for increasing public housing supply. Design/methodology/approach – The study uses the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to solve the MOO model to obtain optimal plot ratio increase (a) and public housing allocation ratio (β). The data of a real LSPS application is used for validation. Findings – The model effectively identifies the Pareto front for LSPS parameters. For the empirical case, the optimal plot ratio increase (a) is 2.57 and the public housing gross floor area (GFA) allocation ratio (β) is 0.7, suggesting that under current parameters: (1) the optimal plot ratio demanded by LSPS applicants (i.e. developers) exists under LSPS framework; (2) the GFA allocation ratio for public housing should adhere to the government's minimum requirement. Policy implications are provided from the government and developer perspectives. Originality/value – Unlike macro-scale land use studies, this article focuses on micro-scale residential land allocation within a real policy framework. It provides the first theoretical and quantitative decision-making tool for LSPS, bridging the gap between theory and practice. This study can be extended to a larger area and broader scope in terms of a replicable methodological framework and extension to PPP projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | land sharing pilot scheme; multi-objective optimization; private land; public housing |
| Index terms: | Hong Kong, validation, multi-objective optimization, policy implication, preference, land use, methodology, land, public housing, genetic algorithm, gross floor area, decision-making, topsis |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, algorithms, building performance, Geography, construction type, real estate economics, professional development, decision-making and reasoning, policy studies, decision-making and optimization, research methods |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Geographical Context, Urban Studies, Governance, Design Practice, Construction Technology, Information Management, Risk Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here