Dong, Z.; Lu, W.; Wu, L.; Jiang, C. and Fu, Y. (2026) Efficiency-enhanced machine learning on blockchain (MLOB) framework for real-time construction activities recognition. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, pp. 1-19. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – Automated recognition of construction activities is central to real-time occupational safety and health (OSH) monitoring. However, integrating machine learning (ML) with blockchain to strengthen privacy and cybersecurity may reduce computational efficiency. To balance this trade-off, this study proposes an efficiency-enhanced machine learning on blockchain (MLOB) framework designed to support real-time performance while maintaining security requirements. Design/methodology/approach – The efficiency-enhanced MLOB framework combines three optimizations: (1) model distillation to reduce ML complexity, (2) parallelization to distribute inference and verification workloads and (3) blockchain configuration tuning to improve consensus and transaction handling. Performance is assessed on a real-world construction activity recognition task and benchmarked against a baseline implementation using end-to-end latency, throughput and security metrics. Findings – Relative to the baseline, MLOB reduces end-to-end latency by 48.4% and increases throughput by 205.8%, while maintaining security performance. These gains enable near real-time, privacy-preserving decision support for OSH applications. Originality/value – The study presents a novel, integrated MLOB architecture that jointly optimizes the ML and blockchain parts. It offers an implementation-ready blueprint for scalable, secure and time-critical construction safety analytics.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | blockchain; efficiency optimization; machine learning |
| Index terms: | decision support, monitoring, machine learning, workload, construction activity, methodology, complexity, configuration, blockchain, efficiency, occupational safety and health, privacy, implementation, time performance, construction safety |
| Subjects: | occupational health and safety management, professional ethics, artificial intelligence, environmental health, decision analysis, computing systems, construction operations, performance management, research methods, systems engineering, management, contractual arrangements, project controls, control systems |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Sustainability, Legal Issues, Quality Management, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Time Control, Site Management, Procurement, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here