Lee, Y. J. (2026) Exploring peer leadership and organizational culture in R&D: A social network and machine learning approach in South korea's construction industry. Construction Innovation, 26(6), ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose – Peer leadership is a significant factor associated with innovation within organizations, particularly in the construction industry. However, the interaction between peer leadership and organizational culture has not been extensively studied. This study aims to explore the relationship between peer leadership and organizational culture among R&D job leaders in major large enterprises and public institutions within South Korea's construction industry. The focus is on understanding the network positions of these leaders and the association between organizational culture and indicators of technological innovation. Design/methodology/approach – The study uses a mixed-method approach combining social network analysis (SNA) and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling. SNA was applied to patent data to identify leaders exhibiting peer leadership, using centrality indicators of inventors. LDA was applied to job-related data to derive organizational culture factors. To investigate the interaction, Spearman correlation analysis was conducted between leaders' technological leadership indicators and organizational culture proportions for each topic identified. Findings – The analysis revealed a significant positive correlation (0.719) between the technological leadership indicator "Structural Constraint" (SC) and the organizational culture corresponding to Topic 8 (supportive research culture). This cultural dimension emphasizes reward systems, fair treatment, stable employment and research-friendly environments. SC reflects the limitations individuals face in network interactions, and the findings suggest a link between technological leadership and navigating these network challenges. Practical implications – The study provides actionable insights for construction organizations to optimize their organizational culture and leadership structures. The findings suggest that understanding and addressing SCs and enhancing peer collaboration may contribute to fostering an environment that supports technological innovation and leadership. Originality/value – This study contributes to the limited body of research on the interplay between technological leadership and organizational culture in the construction industry. By emphasizing the people dimension, it provides a novel perspective on strategies to enhance peer collaboration and innovation in R&D-focused environments.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | machine learning; organizational culture; peer leadership; social network analysis; technological innovation |
| Index terms: | reward system, machine learning, correlation analysis, construction industry, construction organization, collaboration, modelling, social network, technological innovation, organizational culture, strategy, South Korea, methodology, interaction, dimension, employment, social network analysis, face |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, psychology, management, research methods, industry analysis, innovation and technology management, organization, behavioral psychology, artificial intelligence, analytical methods, sociology, Geography, health monitoring assessment and metrics |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here