Artificial intelligence-based strategies for indoor environmental quality optimisation

Semasinghe, K.; Perera, S.; Nanayakkara, S.; Jin, X. and Samaratunga, M. (2026) Artificial intelligence-based strategies for indoor environmental quality optimisation. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, pp. 1-31. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

Purpose – This review examines how data-driven technologies are being applied to improve indoor environmental quality (IEQ) while enhancing energy efficiency in buildings. It further highlights the need for intelligent solutions that balance occupant comfort and environmental impact. Design/methodology/approach – A PRISMA-based systematic review identified studies integrating AI, machine learning, and digital twins for IEQ monitoring, prediction, and control, yielding 152 reviewed papers. Findings – The review indicates that data-driven research largely concentrates on monitoring and predicting IEQ with particular emphasis on thermal comfort and air quality. Considerable attention is also given to enhancing energy efficiency. A wide spectrum of artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques has been applied, including regression and classification models, to represent continuous and categorical IEQ variables. Several studies further integrate AI with BIM and IoT platforms to develop digital twin frameworks enabling real-time performance assessment and adaptive control, though adoption is constrained by data quality, interoperability, and scalability challenges. Research limitations/implications – The review is limited by database scope and keyword selection, suggesting opportunities for broader future investigations. Practical implications – Findings support the development of intelligent building strategies that enhance occupant well-being, reduce emissions, and promote sustainable indoor environments. Originality/value – This review provides a consolidated perspective on how emerging data-driven technologies simultaneously support IEQ improvement and energy efficiency, highlighting the growing role of digital twin systems in intelligent building management.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: artificial intelligence; digital twin; energy efficiency; indoor environmental quality; literature review; machine learning; SDG 03-good health and well-being; SDG 09-intelligent and responsive buildings; SDG 11-sustainable cities and communities; SDG 12-responsible consumption and production
Index terms: energy efficiency, artificial intelligence, database, strategy, platform, interoperability, thermal comfort, digital twin, machine learning, consumption, well-being, systematic literature review, methodology, time performance, health and wellbeing, investigation, indoor environmental quality, environmental impact, monitoring, air quality, intelligent building, indoor environment, comfort, sustainable city, literature review
Subjects: digital engineering, environmental impact, urban design, control systems, environmental science, climate science, research methods, project controls, management, digital design, mental health and wellbeing, design practice, systems and processes, data collection methods, data management, consumer economics, occupational health and safety management, sustainability and energy, artificial intelligence, environmental health, data analysis and analytics, environmental engineering, research evaluation and metrics
Topics: Site Management, Research Practice, Time Control, Sustainability, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here