Shi, X.; Ke, Y.; Wu, X.; Gong, X. and Zhang, J. (2026) How performance-based are China's public-private partnership road projects? A KPI framework and scoring method. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 14, pp. 1-21. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose – This study aims to develop a practical method for evaluating how Performance-Based Contracting (PBC) features are embedded in the design of Public-Private Partnership (PPP) road contracts in China. It addresses a gap in understanding how performance expectations are structured, specified, and enforced during contract formulation. Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative document analysis was conducted using all 26 road PPP projects recorded in China's National PPP Project Information System. A unified three-tier Key Performance Indicator (KPI) framework was developed through iterative coding and consolidation of contract content. A structured scoring method was then created to evaluate contracts across three dimensions: breadth (coverage of performance domains), depth (granularity of indicators), and clarity and enforceability (precision and legal operability). The approach was applied to a representative case to demonstrate its practical utility. Findings – The study presents two core outputs: a benchmark KPI framework and a conceptual scoring method aligned with PBC features. These tools enable systematic and transparent evaluation of how well PPP contracts articulate and support performance expectations. The case application illustrates how contractual provisions can be assessed for structural coverage, operational detail, and enforceability. Originality/value – This paper contributes a replicable framework for diagnosing performance system design in infrastructure contracts. It advances the literature by translating PBC features into measurable contract features and provides practical tools for cross-project comparison, contract template improvement, and policy alignment. The approach supports more consistent integration of performance logic into PPP governance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contract evaluation; infrastructure governance; key performance indicators; performance-based contracting; public-private partnerships |
| Index terms: | China, partnership, integration, governance, dimension, information system, performance-based, methodology, document analysis, road project, key performance indicator |
| Subjects: | business, organizational analysis, performance measurement, project delivery, information systems, partnership management, research methods, data science, infrastructure engineering, Geography, health monitoring assessment and metrics |
| Topics: | Governance, Geographical Context, Digital Applications, Health and Safety, Stakeholder Management, Organizational Design, Project Management, Research Practice, Quality Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here