Stephen, S.; Bello, J.; Aigbavboa, C.; Oke, A. E.; Adekunle, S. and Tambwe, O. (2026) Bibliometric review of gyroscopic mechanisms for adaptive indoor environmental quality control in buildings. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, pp. 1-17. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose – This study investigates how adaptive gyroscopic systems can improve indoor environmental quality (IEQ) and support low-energy building performance in Sub-Saharan Africa. The region faces persistent heat stress and unreliable electricity, and most buildings rely on passive strategies that cannot adjust to changing conditions. The study addresses the lack of research connecting gyroscopic mechanisms to climate-responsive design in this context. Design/methodology/approach – A bibliometric review supported by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol was conducted using Scopus publications from 2003 to 2024. Keyword co-occurrence, citation mapping, and thematic clustering were used to examine research on thermal comfort, ventilation, adaptive shading, energy use, and emerging gyroscopic or AI-assisted control systems. Findings – The analysis shows growing interest in adaptive environmental control, though direct building applications of gyroscopic systems remain limited. Two main clusters emerged: one focused on IEQ performance (thermal comfort, ventilation, energy efficiency) and another on regional sustainability themes. Evidence suggests that gyroscopic mechanisms, especially when paired with lightweight AI tools, can support airflow regulation, sun-responsive shading, and simple energy-management functions suited to low-energy buildings. Research limitations/implications – Further prototype development and real-world testing are needed. Practical implications – Gyroscopic systems can strengthen passive strategies without relying on mechanical cooling. Social implications – More stable indoor conditions can improve comfort and daily well-being in heat-stressed communities. Originality/value – This study is among the first to link adaptive gyroscopic systems with IEQ and low-energy performance in Sub-Saharan Africa.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptive gyroscopic systems; IEQ; low-energy buildings; smart sensing; Sub-Saharan Africa; thermal comfort |
| Index terms: | low-energy building, regulation, testing, sun, face, meta-analysis, mapping, well-being, methodology, systematic literature review, ventilation, comfort, energy use, Sub-Saharan Africa, indoor environmental quality, control system, strategy, publication, energy performance, energy efficiency, environmental control, prototype, clustering, thermal comfort, evidence, heat stress, shading |
| Subjects: | energy efficiency, data science, building design, spatial and geospatial analysis, environmental health, political science, modelling and simulation, environmental engineering, physical geography and landforms, research evaluation and metrics, occupational health and safety management, evaluation and assessment methods, sustainability and energy, monitoring and control, professional practice, energy systems, psychology, air quality, management, mental health and wellbeing, research methods, research dissemination and communication |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Governance, Geographical Context, Sustainability, Design Practice, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here