Wang, L.; Yuan, J.; Su, S.; Weng, S. and Hu, F. (2026) Vision-based progress compliance and worker health monitoring in concrete pouring and vibration. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(10): 04026162, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper proposes a vision-based framework named concrete progress and concrete health monitoring (CPCHM) for automated compliance supervision and health risk assessment during concrete pouring and vibration operations. The framework integrates YOLOv8-pose for worker posture estimation and YOLOv8-detection for equipment identification, achieving average accuracies of 92.8% and 99.5%, respectively. By fusing posture and equipment features, a support vector machine classifier distinguishes between pouring and vibration operations with 90.8% accuracy and an F1-score of 90.3%. Further, a spatiotemporal graph convolutional network is employed to model elbow joint dynamics and assess musculoskeletal risks, reaching a behavioral classification accuracy of 89.6%. To address occlusion and multiworker collaboration, CPCHM introduces a distance-based operator identification method and an adaptive region-of-interest inference mechanism, maintaining stable keypoint tracking and continuous elbow-angle estimation even under partial visibility. The framework is embedded on a Jetson nano edge device, which automatically triggers an acoustic buzzer alert when pouring durations exceed 90 min or vibration times fall outside the 5-15 s standard. CPCHM provides a compact, sensor-free, and scalable solution for integrating progress compliance monitoring and ergonomic health assessment, enabling intelligent and real-time supervision in dynamic concrete construction environments.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | concrete operations; health monitoring; progress compliance monitoring; spatiotemporal modeling; worker-equipment interaction |
| Index terms: | modelling, duration, monitoring, collaboration, estimation, interaction, compliance, vibration, dynamics, supervision, health risk assessment, concrete construction, accuracy, identification method |
| Subjects: | systems engineering, project controls, management, control systems, health safety and environment, mechanical systems, environmental hazards, data analysis and analytics, analytical methods, professional development, behavioral psychology, financial and cost management, building construction |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Cost Management, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Site Management, Research Practice, Time Control, Project Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here