Loosemore, M and Chand, A (2016) Barriers to building resilience to extreme weather events in Australian hospitals. In: Chan, P W and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 32nd Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2016, Manchester, UK.
Abstract
Australia is facing a future of more regular extreme-weather-events (EWEs) and hospitals will play a critical role in managing the significant health impacts of such events. Informed by insights from socio-ecological resilience theory this paper explores the barriers which exist in making Australian hospitals more resilient to EWEs. Employing a single in-depth case study of a major Australian tertiary hospital which has experienced significant EWEs, data was collected using semi-structured interviews, observations of disaster drills and disaster planning meetings, as well as additional documentary analysis of past incident reports. Findings indicate that hospital disaster planning for built environment challanges is compliance-driven, under-resourced, ad-hoc and non-inclusive. There is also widespread ignorance among key stakeholders of the influence of hospital design in delivering healthcare to the community during an EWE event. It is concluded that disaster management planning needs better resourcing and that procedures, systems and technologies must be put in place to foster better stakeholder communication around hospital facility disaster planning for EWEs.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | disaster management planning; extreme weather events; hospitals; socio-ecological resilience theory. |
| Index terms: | disaster management planning, case study, interview, compliance, tertiary, Australia, built environment, weather, stakeholder communication, disaster planning, hospital facility, documentary analysis, socio-ecological resilience theory, extreme weather event |
| Subjects: | air quality, data collection methods, construction type, climate science, data science, curriculum development, environmental science, professional development, Geography, health safety and environment, environmental hazards, infrastructure and transport systems |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Information Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Education, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here