Qin, B (2016) Discourses of competitiveness in the Chinese construction sector. In: Chan, P W and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 32nd Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2016, Manchester, UK.
Abstract
The transition of China to a socialist market economy has transformed the way in which professionals, policy makers and scholars analyze the construction sector. Terms such as competitiveness and enterprise now dominate discussions; however, litter research on how these terms been used and applied has been done. This paper explores shifts in the discourses of competitiveness in Chinese government policy documents into the academic literature and the Chinese construction sector.The competitiveness research agenda has in recent years seen the emerging of various approaches to understanding how competitiveness is constituted in particular national contexts. The focus on discourse encourages researchers to position the popularity of competitiveness within the broader processes of economic restructuring. It is important to recognise that the notion of 'discourse' often comprises policy initiatives and material practices in addition to the associated rhetoric. Hence the discourse of competitiveness is grounded in the changing policy landscape which shapes the business transactions of the contracting sector. Of particular significance is the advent of China’s 'Open Door' policy in 1978. The resulting policy discourse of the social market has since had radical implication for way construction is procured and delivered. Several distinct discourses of competitiveness have been promoted by the Chinese government. Examples include the initial emphasis on basis skills and the subsequent focus on operational management and technological improvement. An analysis of academic and policy discourse stand in sharp contrast to current modes of research which too often seek to reify competitiveness and to define it through a set of pre-determined 'factors'. The discourses analysis presented in here provides a basis for future exploration into the ways in which construction professionals have engaged with a rapidly changing policy and industrial context.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competitiveness; contractors; discourse analysis; policy |
| Index terms: | China, construction sector, construction professional, exploration, government policy, competitiveness, documents, research agenda |
| Subjects: | research management, market analysis, industry analysis, professional development, Geography, environmental resource management, public policy |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Geographical Context, Information Management, Sustainability, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here