Zhang, R P and Lingard, H (2016) A longitudinal analysis of safety climate in the dynamic construction project environment. In: Chan, P W and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 32nd Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2016, Manchester, UK.
Abstract
There has been emerging evidence that safety climate is not stable but changes over time. In the complex and dynamic construction project environment, it is highly likely that safety climate fluctuates over the life of a project. This study longitudinally measured safety climate at construction projects, and also explored the overall safety climate change patterns. Safety climate was measured with a multi-level safety climate measurement instrument. At the organizational level, the instrument measured construction workers' perceptions of client organizational safety response (COSR) and principal contractor organizational safety response (PCOSR). At the workgroup level, the instrument measured workers' perceptions of supervisors' safety response (SSR) and coworkers' safety response (CWSR). Three waves of data collection were undertaken at four processing plant construction projects in New Zealand. The research results indicate that safety climate does change over the life of a construction project at different levels. Workers' perceptions of COSR and PCOSR generally declined across all projects over the three surveys. At two projects, although workers' perceptions of COSR and PCOSR declined between the second survey and the third survey, workers' perceptions of SSR increased during the same period. Moreover, while workers' perceptions of COSR, PCOSR and SSR generally declined between the first survey and the second survey, workers' perceptions of CWSR increased during the same period at three projects. The research highlights the potential role played by supervisors in managing boundary relationships between their workgroups and the organizational environment, and maintaining a positive safety climate in their workgroups. The research also suggests the opportunities to further study the development of safety concerns and responsibilities among construction workers over time, as well as cross-level relationships between managerial activities and locally experienced safety climates.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | safety climate; longitudinal; multi-levels; construction project |
| Index terms: | longitudinal analysis, safety climate, New Zealand, principal contractor, survey, organizational environment, construction project, evidence, construction worker, supervisor |
| Subjects: | evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, practitioner, data analysis and analytics, health safety and environment, Geography, production management, sociology |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here