Akintola, A; Root, D and Venkatachalam, S (2017) Key constraints to optimal and widespread implementation of BIM in the South African construction industry. In: Chan, P W and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 33rd Annual ARCOM Conference, 4-6 September 2017, Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge, UK.
Abstract
Building information modelling (BIM) adoption and implementation has continued to gain prominence across the world albeit to varying extents and with diverse methodologies for creation, use, storage, and re-use of information. Its implementation in South Africa, though spanning about a decade, has been neither widespread nor optimal prompting a need to identify key constraints to achieving these. Data were collected through semi-structured interviewing of purposively selected consultants who have implemented BIM within their organisations and on projects. Key constraints identified as impediments to optimal and widespread implementation of BIM in South Africa include lack of standards and uniform protocols as well as lack of government buy-in and support. These in turn contribute to varying patterns of implementation methodologies among collaborators along with non-interoperability of technology and business processes. The findings establish a clear demand for country-specific standards and institutional backing though current implementers adopt or adapt standards and protocols from other countries leading in BIM. Arguing from a dominant design theoretical perspective however, it is posited that as different countries adopt or adapt standards and implementation methodologies from countries leading in BIM, diverse standards and methodologies across the world may evolve towards a dominant pattern of BIM implementation practice among variants, and with global collaboration, global BIM standards may emerge.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modelling; constraints; standards; South Africa |
| Index terms: | building information modelling, re-use, collaboration, methodology, South Africa, implementation, construction industry, interoperability, key constraint |
| Subjects: | control systems, contractual arrangements, health safety and environment, Geography, management, research methods, industry analysis, information systems, systems and processes |
| Topics: | Procurement, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here