Loosemore, M and Barraket, J (2017) The co-creation of social value between social enterprises and private firms in the construction industry. In: Chan, P W and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 33rd Annual ARCOM Conference, 4-6 September 2017, Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge, UK.
Abstract
The emerging concept of social procurement, underpinned by principles of New Public Governance, is driving new forms of collaboration and partnerships between the private, public and social enterprise sectors in the construction industry. This has led to calls for more research around the new forms of cross sector collaboration arising from the merging of institutional logics between these previously separated sectors. There is currently little understanding of how and why social enterprises and private for-profit firms collaborate in meeting new public sector social procurement requirements and of what institutional and organisational factors shape these practices. Drawing on insights from both management and policy studies, documentary analysis and in-depth interviews with senior leaders of three construction organisations in the UK and Australia, the drivers and consequences of cross-sector collaborations in response to social procurement and the organisational and institutional factors that drive them are explored. The results show that the co-production of social value through supply chain relationships in the construction industry is largely driven by commercial concerns. These are, in turn, influenced by institutional factors, including both industry and political institutional imperatives. It is concluded that there are significant differences in experience and opportunity for collaboration based on supply chain position and organisational scale and that these have notable effects on the co-creation of social value and the legitimacy of different social benefit providers in the construction industry.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | new public governance; cross-sector collaboration; social value; social enterprise; social procurement |
| Index terms: | legitimacy, documentary analysis, co-creation, construction industry, social value, collaboration, co-production, public sector, profit, Australia, partnership, drawing, social benefit, governance, interview, social enterprise, institutional logic, construction organization, organizational factor |
| Subjects: | administrative law, industry analysis, partnership management, sociology, Geography, design process, management, theoretical framing, data science, economic analysis, technical documentation, innovation studies, data collection methods, business, organization |
| Topics: | Governance, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Legal Issues, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here