Rodriguez-Labajos, L; Thomson, C and O'Brien, G (2017) A critical analysis of strategic performance measurement in supporting estate decisions in NHS Scotland. In: Chan, P W and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 33rd Annual ARCOM Conference, 4-6 September 2017, Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge, UK.
Abstract
Formal Strategic Performance Measurement Systems (SPMS’s) are not common among international healthcare providers, and those which are adopted are found largely within centralised public healthcare and often a mandatory requirement of governments. In order to understand the role of SPMS’s applied in the management of healthcare estates, this research seeks to explore the perceptions of senior NHS stakeholders across the UK on the usefulness and value of SPMS’s, with a view to draw out how it manifests itself in other countries with other healthcare governance configurations. Firstly, ten semi-structured interviews were performed with senior stakeholders directly involved in managing estate performance across different regions within UK to explore their perspectives of the value and effectiveness of SPMS’s in promoting improvement. Findings from a UK perspective informed the development of themes to explore in a series of twelve interviews with members of the EuHPN that represent eight countries to elicit the applicability of the SPMS’s within their countries. The findings revealed that SPMS's in the NHS UK are designed to support priorities and goals connected to realising the policy vision and agenda of central government, and concern was expressed that this often did not reflect the best priorities for managing the estate. The SPMS's are mainly used by governments in centralised systems as a tool for exerting power from a distance, an understanding which aligns with Foucault's understanding of governmentality and can be related to the increased need to gain a greater knowledge about how effectively money is being spent by management in order to achieve policy agendas and visions. Despite this in countries where healthcare is not as centralised as in the UK, it was found that there is an interest for adopting a similar system mainly to have a more consistent approach among the different healthcare bodies and nationally.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | decision-making; estates management; healthcare estate; performance measures; strategic performance measurement systems |
| Index terms: | performance measurement, interview, governance, performance measure, decision-making, configuration, Scotland, governmentality, effectiveness |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, government bodies, business, decision analysis, systems engineering, performance measurement, performance management, Geography |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Governance, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here