Belayutham, S and Ibrahim, C K I C (2019) Barriers and strategies for better safety practices: The case of construction SMEs in Malaysia. Construction Economics and Building, 19(1), pp. 20-39. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Despite the various efforts that have been made by the government and construction authorities to strengthen safety practices among SMEs in Malaysia, the construction SMEs are still unable to demonstrate good safety practices. As part of a wider intervention study to improve the safety practices of the SMEs, this study has taken the first step in identifying the barriers and strategies to improve the safety practices at construction sites in Malaysia. The study has been conducted using various approaches (workshops, site observation and questionnaire survey) that have enabled the triangulation of information. The findings highlighted that the main barriers to good safety practices are the implementation costs, poor safety culture and lack of safety commitment from the client. The proposed solutions include introducing safety as one of the construction KPIs, creating more safety-conscious culture and establishing a funding mechanism to support the cost of safety training. Subsequently, several recommendations have been provided by collating inputs based on the barriers, strategies and drivers through three-party collaboration (authorities, industry and academia) in creating a collaborative movement towards enhancing safety practices among the SMEs. The fresh insights from this study would enable authorities and SMEs to be more proactive, rather than reactive in improving safety practices in the construction industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | developing countries; management; safety & hazards; safety and hazards; small and medium-sized enterprises |
| Index terms: | safety culture, Malaysia, developing country, movement, workshop, commitment, strategy, construction site, survey, funding, collaboration, academia, questionnaire, safety training, implementation, construction industry, triangulation |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, economic analysis, psychology, work location, health behaviours and lifestyles, data collection methods, construction type, research design and methodology, industry analysis, occupational health and safety management, educational institutions, health safety and environment, Geography, development economics, management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Procurement, International Construction, Education, Site Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here