Mode of study influences built environment students' perception of their professional development

Vohmann, B; Crabtree, P; Priddle, J and Frame, I (2017) Mode of study influences built environment students' perception of their professional development. In: Chan, P W and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 33rd Annual ARCOM Conference, 4-6 September 2017, Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge, UK.

Abstract

Developing undergraduates' employability skills and preparing them as effective practitioners is an important role of higher education. Accredited undergraduate courses in construction disciplines are designed to help students develop appropriate skills and knowledge to prepare them for professional practice. However, it has been recognised that undergraduates are not always as prepared for professional practice as employers anticipate. To help with students' development as effective practitioners, it is beneficial if they understand what professional skills and knowledge they are developing and how these are valuable in the workplace. Students focus in particular on assessment, as this is central to their academic success. Assessment design and feedback have been recognised as important influences on student learning behaviour. This paper examines undergraduates' perceptions of assessment and feedback in their academic studies to aid their development as effective practitioners. Data was gathered at a post-1992 university. Around the mid-point of each semester undergraduates provide a progress review for their tutors via a short paper-based questionnaire using a four-point Likert scale. Analysis of these completed questionnaires suggests students somewhat understand how their academic studies link with their development as built environment professionals, although feedback was a missed opportunity to enhance their learning. This suggests there may be opportunity to promote student learning through revised pedagogic practice that integrates assessment, feedback and professional practice more effectively than may be the case at present. This research forms part of a doctoral 'work in progress'.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: assessment; employability; feedback; professionalism.
Index terms: higher education, professional development, employability, professional practice, professionalism, built environment, practitioner, Likert scale, questionnaire, undergraduate
Subjects: professional development, educational institutions, infrastructure and transport systems, human resources and leadership, data collection methods, practitioner, curriculum development
Topics: Information Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Urban Studies, Education
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here