Wandahl, S and Skovbogaard, J (2017) Towards improving productivity on refurbishment projects. In: Chan, P W and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 33rd Annual ARCOM Conference, 4-6 September 2017, Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge, UK.
Abstract
Objectives: Refurbishment projects have shown a negative productivity development in the last decades. Several national and international research project on sustainable refurbishment has been initiated in the last decade. However, few of this pay much attention to the construction management's contribution to sustainability. In the REVALUE research project, one aim was to enhance the scientific body of knowledge on the subject and create a productivity baseline on refurbishment projects. Further, it evaluated the productivity potential inherent in the refurbishment processes.Methods: A refurbishment case study was selected, and data was collected through a work sampling study, comprising to more than 2,200 data point. A lean perspective was adopted to estimate the share of time, a construction crew spends on value adding and non-value adding activities. The crew installs pre-constructed lightweight facade modules on the refurbishment case.Results: The data analysis showed that 31% of the time was spent on production, and 69% of the time was spent on non-value adding activities. The analysis combined with observations on-site documented potential improvements using the lean tools 5S, Kanban, 5 times why and Value Stream Mapping. In total, it was possible to reduce waste 12% and to increase productivity 27%.Conclusion: The impact was a relative reduction of 8% in direct labor costs for the contractor, which equals a 1% reduction in client costs. Thus, the potential gain from increasing productivity is relatively higher for the contractor than for the client. The process showed an improvement potential, and change in the current distribution resulting in relatively large productivity increases. The baseline created here can be used to evaluate interventions effect on productivity in refurbishment projects.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | refurbishment; productivity; work sampling study; lean; waste |
| Index terms: | data analysis, case study, value stream mapping, productivity, sampling, module, labour cost, refurbishment project, estimate, body of knowledge |
| Subjects: | business, data collection methods, financial and cost management, data analysis and analytics, knowledge management, architectural elements, management, infrastructure engineering, cost management |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here