Bröchner, J and Silfwerbrand, J (2019) Performance of performance specifications in design-build highway projects. Construction Economics and Building, 19(2), pp. 111-125. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Design-build contracts with performance-based specifications are believed to raise productivity and the innovation rate. Such specifications for highway and bridge contracts may create risks, be too detailed or difficult to verify. The purpose has been to analyse how performance-based requirements are used in Swedish design-build contracts for highway projects. How contractors are encouraged to provide innovative technologies is emphasized. Generic documents from the Swedish Transport Administration for design-build contracts have been studied, and case studies of six design-build contracts with performance-based requirements have been made. Technical specifications for these contracts have been analysed and interviews held with both client and contractor project managers. Results include that it is along the time axis that major obstacles to innovation arise. Before the contractor is able to develop innovative solutions, the initial design plan restricts the highway geometry. During construction, a mix of performance and prescriptive requirement formulations is more of a challenge than clashes between performance requirements. The client may avoid performance language, more so for bridges than road surfaces, because of concerns with efficient maintenance in the future. It is recommended that performance-based specifications should be less detailed and that a life cycle view of highway projects should support innovative technologies.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | design-build contracting; highway construction; maintenance; performance-based requirements; Sweden |
| Index terms: | performance-based specification, interview, case study, project manager, specification, geometry, life cycle, productivity, Sweden, highway construction, performance specification, documents, performance-based |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, value management, mathematical modelling, data collection methods, profession, professional development, contractual condition, Geography, tendering, civil engineering, management, performance measurement |
| Topics: | Procurement, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Business Strategy, Contract Administration, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here