Gjerde, M (2018) Managing New Zealand urban streetscape design: Understanding people's preferences. In: Gorse, C and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 34th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2018, Queen’s University, Belfast, UK.
Abstract
Urban design is conducted at scales and across timeframes that are much broader/longer than those of conventional, time bound projects. Indeed, as noted by Christopher Alexander, the aim of urban design is to orchestrate the outcomes of discrete projects such that they each contribute to a more coherent whole. In most cases the coherent whole is centred on public streets, the spaces that people use every day as they conduct their lives. Increasingly, researchers and public space managers are renewing their interests in streets. How can they best be designed and managed to ensure they meet with people’s needs and desires? The challenge is of course that, while the publicly owned space may be controlled effectively by local authorities, it is the privately-owned properties that line streets that have the greatest influence on their character. The paper contextualises a recent empiric study of people’s streetscape preferences. After identifying the building and street characteristics that people find most attractive, the paper speculates on the means by which these can be interpreted and articulated in the instruments and processes used by local government to manage development. The paper challenges the laissez faire approaches that have arguably diminished the spatial qualities of many contemporary streets, arguing for proactive approaches to designing and managing urban streets. The research contributes to knowledge about facility management at an urban scale.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | environmental aesthetics; streetscape; urban design review |
| Index terms: | preference, public space, local authority, aesthetic, New Zealand, urban design, local government, manager |
| Subjects: | practitioner, factor and component analysis, decision-making and reasoning, urban design and public space, Geography, urban design, sociology, administrative law |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here