Lester, D and Torero, J (2019) Using megaproject performance outcomes to enhance decision-making behaviors in civil engineering graduates. Construction Economics and Building, 19(1), pp. 96-110. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
A comprehensive review of megaproject performance propositioned the issues leading to project failure as behavioral. Project failure linked cost overruns and schedule delays to acts of delusion and deception, citing the ability to learn lessons, and the misalignment of incentives as influencing factors. A mixed-methods study was designed to gain insight into the decision-making behaviors of undergraduate civil engineers, and the role that education could play in enhancing decision-making. A co-curricular intervention led to qualitative exploration of decision-making in civil engineering undergraduates. Motivation featured heavily, particularly a conflict between interest and enjoyment, and the reward structures of traditional education and industry. Results led to a quantitative measure of intrinsic motivation and critical thinking ability. Findings from the educational environment have implications for industry and led to recommendations regarding the importance of autonomy and relatedness, to a megaproject environment.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | curriculum design; deception; decision; delusion; making; megaproject |
| Index terms: | schedule delay, influencing factor, performance outcome, project failure, cost overrun, motivation, civil engineer, undergraduate, decision-making, exploration, critical thinking, megaproject, misalignment |
| Subjects: | value management, specialized education, project completion, risk assessment, engineering problems, profession, financial and cost management, strategic project management, curriculum development, environmental resource management, psychology, decision analysis, project controls |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Human Resources, Time Control, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here