Towards the generation of digital twins for facility management based on 3D point clouds

Stojanovic, V; Trapp, M; Richter, R; Hagedorn, B and Döllner, J (2018) Towards the generation of digital twins for facility management based on 3D point clouds. In: Gorse, C and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 34th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2018, Queen’s University, Belfast, UK.

Abstract

Advances and adaptation of Industry 4.0 practices in Facility Management (FM) have created demand for use of up-to-date digitized building assets. The use of Building Information Modelling (BIM) for FM in the Operation and Maintenance (O&M) stages of the building lifecycle is intended to bridge the gap between operations and digital data, but lacks the functionality of assessing and forecasting the state of the built environment in real-time. To accommodate this, BIM data needs to be constantly updated with the current state of the built environment. However, generation of <em>as-is</em> BIM data for a digital representation of a building is a labor intensive process. While some software applications offer a degree of automation for the generation of <em>as-is</em> BIM data, they can be impractical to use for routinely updating FM digital documentation. Current approaches for capturing the state of the built environment using remote sensing and photometry-based methods allow for the creation of point clouds that can be used as the basis for <em>digital twins, </em>along with existing BIM and FM documentation. Point clouds themselves do not contain any specific information about the building components they represent physically, but using machine learning methods they can be reconstructed as a BIM or used by themselves for assessment of the physical environment. Additional layers of information such as sensor data analytics can also be included. We present and describe our current research and development progress of a service-oriented platform that learns to interpret the contents presented by captured point clouds. We place a specific focus on the reconstruction and visualization of the captured state of the built environment for increasing FM stakeholder engagement and facilitating collaboration.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: digital twins; building information modelling; facility management; point clouds; visualization
Index terms: industry 4.0, collaboration, operation and maintenance, machine learning, automation, built environment, forecasting, digital twin, functionality, documentation, lifecycle, reconstruction, adaptation, platform, remote sensing, building information modelling, stakeholder engagement, research and development, visualization, sensor data, point cloud, building component
Subjects: project delivery, prediction and forecasting, building construction, artificial intelligence, professional development, architectural elements, design practice, digital engineering, research products and data, digital design, automation and robotics, technology adoption, user focus, management, community and social dimensions, maintenance engineering, information systems, design features, infrastructure and transport systems, research management
Topics: Urban Studies, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Digital Applications, Information Management, Project Management, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here