Managing the benefits and impediments to offsite construction in the UK construction industry

Ajayi, S; Brinklow-Harris, J; Alaka, H A and Dauda, J A (2019) Managing the benefits and impediments to offsite construction in the UK construction industry. In: Gorse, C and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 35th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2019, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.

Abstract

The use of offsite methods of construction has long been recognised as a suitable method for increasing the supply of housing and addressing productivity in the construction industry. Whilst the literature is rife with the many benefits of the modern methods of construction as well as barriers to its implementation, its adoption remains relatively low. This study contributes to the discussion by investigating the strategies for further harnessing the benefits of the increasingly important method of construction as well as the measures for mitigating its challenges. In line with the tenet of phenomenological research, which seeks to explore the phenomenon from the perspectives of the industry experts, 12 interviews were carried out with construction professionals. The data were analysed using thematic analysis, thereby unravelling the emerging themes that emanated from the interviews. After identifying such benefits of offsite construction as increased built quality, waste mitigation, and time efficiency, among others, the strategies for maximising these benefits were presented. These include enhanced training, use of digital tools, standardisation of building components and more efficient pre-planning activities, among others. Similarly, impediments to the use of offsite construction techniques such as its high initial cost, negative stigma, non-supportive project delivery models and clients' resistance could be addressed through some measures. These measures include the development of new supply chain management model, training and education, enabling legislation and vertical integration within companies. This study will help to identify the measures for enhancing the adoption and implementation of offsite technologies in the UK construction industry. Future research is recommended to assess the government’s role in being the driving force behind implementing prefabrication-specific policies and incentives to encourage its future use.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: prefabrication; off-site construction; productivity
Index terms: construction industry, prefabrication, off-site construction, implementation, project delivery, building component, housing, standardization, time efficiency, construction professional, mitigation, thematic analysis, vertical integration, productivity, strategy, interview, legislation, modern methods of construction
Subjects: project delivery, legal systems, contractual arrangements, data collection methods, construction type, vertical integration, building construction, industry analysis, management, architectural elements, performance measurement, professional development, financial risk, methods and analysis
Topics: Legal Issues, Design Practice, Supply Chain Management, Quality Management, Construction Technology, Procurement, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Information Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here