Hermans, M; Veldhuis, H; Huizing, D and Rots, S (2019) The embedding of the construction client role in Dutch municipalities and its effects on professionalism and organisational learning. In: Gorse, C and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 35th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2019, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Abstract
Municipalities account for a considerable share in the total production of construction work in the Netherlands. Through their commissioning role, public entities can act as a 'launching customer’ for innovation within the construction sector. New procurement schemes have been and are being installed to improve quality and productivity, reduce risks and enhance sustainability within the industry. The effective application of these schemes requires a professional commissioning organisation, able to consistently adopt and further develop these new schemes. A clear and efficient organizational structure and efficient processes are prerequisite for knowledge management and organisational learning. A qualitative research project investigated the governance structure and embedding of the commissioning role in 18 large and middle-sized Dutch municipalities through structured interviews and additional document analysis. Next to an overview of the substance and nature of the municipal construction activity and its related procurement schemes, the research focussed on mapping the organisational structure, the positioning of commissioning activities within the municipal organisation and the related governance of commissioning activity. The third aspect of the research encompassed the assessment of the municipal representatives regarding their own professionalism. The research elucidates the shattering of the commissioning role over a considerable number of entities within the municipal organisation, with restricted mutual alignment. Furthermore, the assignment of the administrative responsibility for complex multifaceted projects is not clear-cut and can vary from one situation to another; the political responsibility for the built environment is allocated to various alderman and organisational models and governance structures issued by municipalities show substantial variation and hybridity. Although differences exist between large and mid-size municipalities, both types of municipalities can improve the organizational structures and processes related to commissioning professionalism. The research concludes that to improve professionalism regarding commissioning, preconditions for knowledge management and organisational learning should be improved, starting with stimulating the awareness of the relevance of commissioning role.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | purchasing and procurement; public administration; governance structures; knowledge management; organisational learning |
| Index terms: | document analysis, Netherlands, purchasing, productivity, construction activity, construction client, organizational learning, interview, governance, organizational structure, construction sector, professionalism, knowledge management, municipality, mapping, variation, qualitative research, commissioning, construction work, built environment |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, research design and methodology, business, practitioner, operations management, construction operations, data science, management, spatial and geospatial analysis, contractual condition, Geography, professional development, sociology, infrastructure and transport systems, procurement strategy, industry analysis, administrative law, completion |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Governance, Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Quality Management, Contract Administration, Organizational Design, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here