Regeneration of Sub-Saharan africa's open market places: A case for guileless stakeholder participation

Adinyira, E; Agyekum, K; Baiden, B K; Ebohon, O J and Ampratwum, G (2020) Regeneration of Sub-Saharan africa's open market places: A case for guileless stakeholder participation. Construction Economics and Building, 20(2), pp. 165-180. ISSN 2204-9029

Abstract

Sub-Saharan Africa’s urban culture makes open marketplaces an essential part of life in their cities. What goes on in these markets undoubtedly opens them up to threats of adversity, tragedy, and other significant sources of stress. How can these open marketplaces be regenerated into resiliently sustainable places? From a case study of the regeneration redevelopment of the largest open-air market in West Africa i.e. Kumasi Central Market, the need for stakeholder participation in the entire regeneration process is emphasised. The determination of the most important stakeholders during the regeneration of the market is followed by a comparison of the regeneration process regeneration with the literature on urban regeneration, sustainable development, participation, and project management. Lessons learned, and the concerns raised by major stakeholders in the process creates certain project management approaches essential for achieving resilient urban regeneration. Identification of all important stakeholders by the consideration of their attributes of power, legitimacy and urgency and distrustfully engaging all stakeholders is vital to the success of any urban regeneration project.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: open market place; participation; project management; stakeholders; sustainable development; urban regeneration.
Index terms: sustainable development, case study, stakeholder participation, West Africa, redevelopment, markets, lessons learned, urban regeneration, legitimacy, project management, Sub-Saharan Africa
Subjects: professional development, economic analysis, physical geography and landforms, project management theory and practice, sociology, post-disaster and reconstruction, infrastructure and transport systems, community and social dimensions, health safety and environment, data collection methods
Topics: Research Practice, Project Management, Urban Studies, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Information Management, Stakeholder Management, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here