Opoku, A and Tallon, A (2019) The role of project sponsors in defining and realising project benefits. In: Gorse, C and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 35th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2019, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Abstract
Project sponsors are charged with championing projects in organisations to create value in line with organisational strategy. Analysis of project benefits management enables the business to understand opportunities for improvement and provide a theoretical understanding of the issues faced when large public sector organisations implement the sponsor role. The study examines how the sponsor defines project benefits, aligns them with organisational strategy and ensures they are delivered. The paper presents the results of a Case study involving a major public sector organisation in the United Kingdom with qualitative data collection through interviews with 14 sponsors across the business. The results show that the sponsor’s role is to define, manage and deliver project benefits in line with an organisations strategy. It also confirms that sponsors must be empowered and held to account in order to create meaningful value for an organisation. No business can survive without creating value for customers, and therefore project sponsorship is an essential function of organisations. Even though the research is based on one case study organisation, the result is applicable to other large client organisations, government departments and local authorities in an attempt to improve their sponsorship functions.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | project sponsor; project benefits; benefits management; organisational strategy |
| Index terms: | organizational strategy, interview, project sponsor, case study, United Kingdom, strategy, local authority, public sector organization, client organization |
| Subjects: | management, Geography, sociology, administrative law, client relations, business, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Stakeholder Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here