Aigbavboa, C O; Oke, A E; Aghimien, D O and Akinradewo, O I (2020) Improving resilience of cities through smart city drivers. Construction Economics and Building, 20(2), pp. 45-64. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
The embracement of smart city approach as a sustainable system for the management and delivery of infrastructural developments has been on the increase, especially in developed and some developing countries. For this to be successful, cities in these countries, particularly in developing ones like South Africa, needs to be resilient because even though resilience can be achieved by making cities smart, smartness does not bring resilience by default. Thus, this study examines various factors influencing the ability of cities to develop resilience through smart city drivers. A survey of construction professionals involved in the design, planning, development and general management of cities and their infrastructure was carried out with the aid of a well-structured questionnaire. Factors influencing resilience were grouped into five divisions which are climate change, education, food security, public safety and threat to disease, in order of their importance. Findings revealed that the most important of these factors are the development of literacy and technical skills of citizens, regeneration of agricultural land and increased localised food production. The paper further examined the effects of these factors on six smart city drivers and found out that smart economy has the most influence on the resilience of a city. It was concluded that stakeholders concerned with the achievement of resilient smart city must give attention to the major needs of its citizens, and such needs are better produced locally.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | information technology; resilient city; smart city; smart technology; social cohesion; sustainable construction |
| Index terms: | questionnaire, construction professional, social cohesion, information technology, climate change, South Africa, resilient smart city, default, agricultural land, sustainable construction, public safety, technical skill, food security, resilient city, developing country, survey, smart city |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, urban sustainability, dispute resolution, computing systems, climate science, sustainability and resilience, environmental resource management, Geography, urban design, sustainable construction, development economics, professional development, sociology, emergency and crisis management |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Legal Issues, International Construction, Health and Safety, Information Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here