Shahrin, F and Udeaja, C (2019) Evaluation of the challenges in using building information modelling to improve client’s requirements delivery. In: Gorse, C and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 35th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2019, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Abstract
The growing recognition that clients are at the driving force in the construction industry has led to repeated calls for the construction industry to deliver better value-for-money for its clients. These calls are in response to the criticisms of the industry by clients, who argue that industry supply chains do not always meet their requirements. While the problem can be attributed to many factors, such as poor-quality materials, fragmented nature of the industry and complex nature of the projects, which contribute to the overall clients' satisfaction, the understanding of client requirements are critical for the overall project success. In this regard, it is important that the supply chains should spend time to understand their clients' needs at the early stage of the project. The supply chains have used conventional tools, methodology or even theoretical discussion to explore the best solutions to create better dynamics and experience among team members and client. However, there are many proponents in this area who believe that the conventional approaches are inadequate and need to be more innovative. Building information modelling (BIM) has been identified by these proponents as the methodology to improve the briefing process and also aim to create added value within the supply chain (SC). The aim of the current study is to evaluate the challenges in using BIM during briefing, design and construction stages. The study will adopt a qualitative approach and will use semi-structured interviews to gather data from 17 industry practitioners, moving from Level 1 to level 2 BIM with varying level of BIM skills and knowledge across three projects at different stages. It is anticipated that BIM has the potential increase understanding and provide positive feedback to the client and the end-users better visualisation of alternative solutions which is crucial for the efficient iterative design process.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modelling, clients requirements, engagement, supply chains and visualisation |
| Index terms: | methodology, dynamics, practitioner, client requirements, design and construction, visualization, construction industry, value-for-money, briefing, building information modelling, interview, added value, project success, design process, satisfaction, qualitative approach |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, project delivery, contractual arrangements, scope management, design methods, practitioner, data collection methods, systems engineering, information systems, industry analysis, project management theory and practice, evaluation, professional development, research methods, design practice |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Value Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here