Sumanarathna, N and Rowlinson, R (2019) Examining construction contractors' innovation through the lens of exploration and exploitation. In: Gorse, C and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 35th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2019, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Abstract
Construction industry is recognised for its lack of innovative nature. As a project-based industry which forms temporary project settings to deliver one-off outputs, the industry constraints construction organisations to implement innovation. However, recent arguments claim that traditional measurements such as profit, number of patents and amount of R&D do not appraise innovation entirely within organisational context. The necessity of contemporary measures or different perspectives to address hidden innovation has been recognised. This study attempts at investigating the deployment of innovation of construction contractor organisations through the lens of exploration and exploitation. The literature findings reveal that organisations improve their capability to innovate by learning and transferring knowledge to different organisational levels. Exploration and exploitation-two different learning approaches are adopted to develop a conceptual framework to explain the innovation of contractor organisations at organisational, project and project portfolio levels. When construction projects are collaboratively procured (i.e. Partnering, PPP, Design and Build, Management Contracting and New Engineering Contracts), construction organisations are likely to innovate more. This phenomenon is also discussed adopting social capital perspective.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction contractor organisations; construction industry; exploration; exploitation; innovation. |
| Index terms: | construction organization, partnering, contractor organization, New Engineering Contract, profit, exploitation, social capital, exploration, construction project, construction industry, construction contractor, conceptual framework, design and build, management contracting, project-based industry |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, sociology, partnership management, production management, theoretical framing, management, economic analysis, contractual arrangements, environmental resource management, practitioner, organization |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here