Measuring social value in UK construction

Watts, G; Dainty, A and Fernie, S (2019) Measuring social value in UK construction. In: Gorse, C and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 35th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2019, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.

Abstract

Within the UK construction industry Social Value (SV) is a public sector procurement criterion of such importance that how a contractor engages with SV could ultimately be the difference between procurement success and failure. Despite this, agreements on defining SV are still heavily debated as each client arguably has a unique interpretation. Yet against the backdrop of such debates contactors' are increasingly expected to measure and communicate their SV. Therefore, contractors will need to engage with SV practices that reflect client interpretations, and communicate SV in ways clients understand. However, at the heart of SV exists a conflict between the subjective nature of SV and the objective way SV is expected to be measured and communicated. This problem manifests itself in unsuccessful procurement attempts resulting from contractors not fully understanding client SV needs, and practices being undertaken that ultimately result in little SV. The most popular SV measurement tools attempt to circumvent these problems by reducing SV to a monetary metric. Although this arguably misses the wider, nuanced and more difficult to measure aspects of SV. The aim of this paper is to explore how the concept of SV can be operationalised and the wider and nuanced aspects not captured in financial metrics be measured and communicated in a way that is understood by multiple stakeholders. Interviews and questionnaires are conducted with construction contractors, public sector clients and the recipients of SV practices in an attempt to reconcile the subjective and objective conflict at the heart of SV. The results of which provide a workable solution with the development of a SV measurable tool. This paper contributes to the growing debates around SV measurement. The tool has contributed to a main contractor’s procurement success, and improved their SV practices, with results communicated in a way that is simultaneously understood by diverse stakeholders.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: social value act; legitimacy theory; procurement; CSR
Index terms: public-sector client, public sector procurement, main contractor, interview, agreements, legitimacy, construction industry, heart, construction contractor, social value, questionnaire
Subjects: industry analysis, sociology, medical science and clinical practice, contractual arrangements, contract formation, practitioner, data collection methods
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Contract Administration, Organizational Design, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here