Key ingredients for a collaborative urban regeneration strategy in the global South

Boyle, L and Michell, K (2020) Key ingredients for a collaborative urban regeneration strategy in the global South. Construction Economics and Building, 20(2), pp. 150-164. ISSN 2204-9029

Abstract

The paper documents the development of a collaborative regeneration strategy for a marginalised community in Cape Town that was led by a Non-Profit Company (NPC). NPC’s vision for the strategy was to incorporate key inputs from the community to unlock the economic potential of the area and promote upliftment. A case study methodology was adopted which included a series of interviews and community engagement workshops. The research aimed to identify the key ingredients required to drive collaborative urban regeneration in marginalised communities in the global south. The study established that in the absence of effective leadership and service delivery from local authorities the community feel disenfranchised as their community is not seen as an immediate priority. There was a deep-rooted mistrust in the process being driven by the NPC and the visioning process was met with resistance and suspicion. The engagement process lacked depth/scope and reflected a top-down approach. It is concluded that fundamental ingredients for effective collaborative urban regeneration is trust between the key stakeholders, a diverse assortment of expertise and skills, and an in-depth engagement process. Without these factors urban regeneration is likely to only entrench the complex urban issues it seeks to reconcile.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: collaborative urban regeneration; global South; marginalised communities; non; public participation; state actors
Index terms: non-profit, community engagement, local authority, strategy, marginalized community, interview, case study, workshop, service delivery, public participation, urban regeneration, methodology, documents
Subjects: participation process, community and social dimensions, organization, data collection methods, construction type, sociology, demography, professional development, service delivery, research methods, post-disaster and reconstruction, management
Topics: Urban Studies, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here