Bouazza, T and Greenwood, D (2020) An investigation of performance gaps in the design of UK healthcare facilities. In: Scott, L and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 36th Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-8 September 2020, Online Event, UK.
Abstract
The 'design performance gap', a situation in which design fails to meet user expectations, has been increasingly discussed in recent decades. This research concerns the design of healthcare facilities and ways of improving it, through the comparison of designers' performance and the satisfaction level of users. A literature review is first presented of existing work on the assessment of design performance, performance gaps and ways of closing them, with a particular focus on the key issues in the design of healthcare facilities. The data collection involved two questionnaire surveys and fourteen interviews. The surveys encompassed Likert scale and open-ended questions that were assigned to designers to explore their awareness and response to important problems encountered in the design of healthcare facilities. This was followed up by in-depth interviews with selected designers. The second survey questioned the satisfaction of healthcare users about aspects of the design of their healthcare environment. Two situations emerged: (1) where designers are aware of the issues, think they are addressing them, and users are satisfied; and (2) where designers are aware of the issues and believe they are addressing them, but users are nevertheless dissatisfied. The conclusion is that designers have insufficient information on certain user requirements. Better user information is paramount for better design decision-making and for the quality of healthcare facility design. A conceptual framework and matrices were developed that could raise awareness of this and help in improving design decision-making through improved Post-Occupancy Evaluation.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | conceptual framework; design knowledge; healthcare facilities; performance gaps; post-occupancy evaluation. |
| Index terms: | conceptual framework, design decision, performance gap, investigation, questionnaire, Likert scale, literature review, post-occupancy evaluation, designer, survey, interview, user requirement, satisfaction |
| Subjects: | performance management, theoretical framing, design practice, user-centered design, data collection methods, profession, project delivery, evaluation methods, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here