Denny-Smith, G and Loosemore, M (2020) A theoretical framework of social value in construction employment. In: Scott, L and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 36th Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-8 September 2020, Online Event, UK.
Abstract
Construction companies are increasingly being required to demonstrate the social value they create when tendering for public sector projects and for socially responsible private clients. However, the concept of social value remains theoretically under-developed and there are many unanswered questions about how to define and measure it. Addressing these important questions, the aim of this empirical paper is to present a novel theory of social value in the context of social procurement practices in the construction industry. Using a theory of value embedded with employer of choice literature, we theorise that construction companies create social value when they provide employment that promotes 'work benefits' and 'culture benefits'. We test this theory using a semi-structured survey of 55 construction workers. The results show that construction industry employers create social value when they provide work benefits like adequate training, feedback, pay and advancement in the organisation, and culture benefits like fostering good quality working relationships, helping employees feel strong about their personal identity and values and high levels of engagement with local communities and workers, in the context of construction employment in Australia. The theory presented in this paper provides promising avenues for practitioners and future research. Researchers can test or develop this theory in other settings. Practitioners can use this theory to plan for social procurement or evaluate their existing business practices.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | community-based research; employer-of-choice; social procurement; social value; social value theory. |
| Index terms: | community-based, public sector, construction company, survey, Australia, employment, social value, practitioner, identity, construction worker, construction industry |
| Subjects: | sociology, industry analysis, communities and social development, administrative law, management, Geography, data collection methods, organization, practitioner |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Human Resources, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here