Refugee experiences of finding decent work in the Australian construction industry

Loosemore, M; Hammad, A and Alkilani, S Z (2020) Refugee experiences of finding decent work in the Australian construction industry. In: Scott, L and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 36th Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-8 September 2020, Online Event, UK.

Abstract

Australia has a long history of successfully resettling refugees. However, refugees are over-represented in the ranks of the unemployed, under-employed and precariously employed and can quickly become frustrated and despondent, as their attempts to gain employment are thwarted by many structural and cultural barriers to obtaining work. While there are many schemes to help refugees and skilled migrants obtain employment, there is a need for new innovative solutions to address this important and growing social problem. To this end, and in addressing the surprising lack of construction research in this area, this paper explores the potential role of construction social procurement in integrating refugees into sustainable employment. A survey of 100 refugees, skilled migrants and asylum seekers who have worked or attempted to seek work in the Australian construction industry reveal many formal and informal institutional barriers to securing meaningful employment. These include: poor social networks and capital; lack of recognition of previous qualifications; racism and discrimination; language problems; visa restrictions; housing instability; and ongoing family problems. It is concluded that many of these problems can be addressed through social procurement intermediaries which encourage greater cross-sector collaboration between the government, construction and third sector organisations.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: corporate social responsibility; collaboration; employment; migrants; social procurement; refugees.
Index terms: intermediary, housing, history, corporate social responsibility, construction industry, discrimination, refugee, collaboration, Australia, racism, survey, social network, employment, qualification
Subjects: business, data collection methods, construction type, architectural and construction history, educational resources, management, health safety and environment, Geography, sociology, demography, professional ethics, industry analysis
Topics: Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Ethics, Human Resources, Organizational Design, Education, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Construction Technology
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here