Arai, K and Morimoto, E (2021) What is required for recovering from disaster: Theoretical and empirical verification. In: Scott, L and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 37th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-7 September 2021, Online Event, UK.
Abstract
The Great East Japan Earthquake, which occurred on March 11, 2011, had a magnitude of 9.0. The massive tsunami that followed caused extensive damage in coastal districts, resulting in 19,747 deaths and 2,556 missing persons. In terms of reconstruction, there are three main areas of focus: 1) support for the disaster victims (the number of evacuees has been reduced from 470,000 to 43,000 by responding in detail to issues that arise as reconstruction progresses), 2) reconstruction of homes and towns (housing reconstruction is progressing steadily, with most of the construction work completed; the relocation of housing areas to higher ground and the construction of public disaster housing is expected to be completed in FY2020), and 3) revitalisation of industries and livelihoods (production facilities have been mostly restored, production levels in the three affected prefectures have largely recovered, and support for tourism promotion is underway but is currently difficult due to COVID-19). This study examines the necessary and sufficient conditions for proceeding with this recovery, restoration, and revitalisation from an economic theoretical perspective and from public procurement data empirically, exploring their applicability in the post-COVID-19 world. Demand control measures are the first necessary condition to recover from significant damage, including that to infrastructure. Besides, supplier support measures are a sufficient condition to provide more effective and efficient construction services. As a tentative conclusion, an analysis of Japan's public procurement data shows that short-term demand-boosting measures have worked well. However, medium- and long-term supply stimulus measures need further efforts. In Japan, these practices are being applied in response to COVID-19. Specifically, it emphasizes productivity improvement through partnering and the use of new technologies.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | demand control; great East Japan earthquake; necessary condition; partnering; sufficient condition |
| Index terms: | productivity, Japan, relocation, reconstruction, COVID-19, recovery, partnering, promotion, new technology, restoration, housing, housing reconstruction, tourism, construction work, tsunami, great East Japan earthquake |
| Subjects: | building construction, partnership management, market analysis, environmental hazards, industry analysis, post-disaster and reconstruction, management, health risk and incident analysis, renovation and retrofit, Geography, operations management, innovation and technology management, construction type |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Urban Studies, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here