Identifying and ranking the occupational stressors and developing a TOPSIS framework for project managers in Iran to cope with occupational stress

Asnaashari, E; Doulabi, R Z; Dadkhah, N; Saghafi, N and Ghanbariha, L (2021) Identifying and ranking the occupational stressors and developing a TOPSIS framework for project managers in Iran to cope with occupational stress. In: Scott, L and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 37th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-7 September 2021, Online Event, UK.

Abstract

Occupational stress (OS) is the result of the accumulation of stressors and the interaction between working conditions and individual needs and personality. Owing to the nature of the construction industry, the levels of technical and social complexities are high in projects, and this causes tensions and stress specifically for employees who take management positions. Moreover, as construction is widely affected by political and economic instability and external environmental factors, project management often needs to overcome an extra amount of stress that endangers their mental and physical health. The devastating impacts of excessive stress can be observed in the project manager’s personal life, projects progress and consequently on the performance of construction organisations. This research has refined and prioritised the stressors by interviewing project managers and administering a survey using the RII technique. Moreover, stress coping strategies have been proposed and ranked by therapists using the Delphi technique that includes two iterations of interviews and one iteration of weighting the coping strategies for each stressor by implementing the TOPSIS method. The outcome is presented in a framework that can improve the understanding of project managers in Iran on occupational stress and strategies to overcome excessive stress in construction projects.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction projects managers; Iran; mental health; occupational stress; stressors; stress coping strategies
Index terms: construction project, coping, Delphi technique, environmental factor, working conditions, construction industry, interaction, project management, complexity, mental health, interview, stressors, manager, construction organization, project manager, strategy, topsis, occupational stres, personality, survey
Subjects: health conditions and diseases, occupational health and safety management, behavioral psychology, systems engineering, decision-making and optimization, industry analysis, management, project management theory and practice, production management, employment law, environmental science, organization, data collection methods, profession, practitioner
Topics: Legal Issues, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here