Project governance practices in urban public housing projects: A case study of public housing in Malaysia

Latiff, A M A; Jaapar, A and Isa, C M M (2020) Project governance practices in urban public housing projects: A case study of public housing in Malaysia. Construction Economics and Building, 20(4), pp. 120-136. ISSN 2204-9029

Abstract

The urban public housing project, especially for low-income people, is essential to cater to the increasing urbanisation rate in Malaysia. This study aimed to gain an understanding of the project governance practices in urban public housing projects in Malaysia, which will lead to better project delivery and the successful outcome of the projects. A single case study was conducted on a public housing project or known as Projek Perumahan Rakyat (PPR) in Kuala Lumpur, and data for this study was gathered using semi-structured interviews with six (6) public officials, document analysis, and observation. The findings of this study indicate the positive interplay between project actors guided by the elements of trust, stakeholder management, empowerment, and collective decision making, which create value for the project. Hence, this article contributes to the dynamic understanding of how public officials practice project governance in conducting their works related to urban public housing projects. The findings of the study will enable related public organisations to reinforce the underlying project governance elements towards the strengthening of urban public housing delivery system. Case study research in different models of urban public housing could extend the discovery of other project governance elements while validating the findings of this study from different perspectives. The findings of the study are limited due to the use of a single case study related to the urban public housing project and its contexts.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Malaysia; public housing; project governance; stakeholder management; urban poor
Index terms: document analysis, case study, governance, empowerment, urbanization, interview, Malaysia, project delivery, urban poor, stakeholder management, strengthening, public housing, decision-making, income
Subjects: community and social dimensions, business, data collection methods, construction type, project delivery, economic analysis, participation process, data science, urban planning, Geography, management, structural engineering, decision analysis
Topics: Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Governance, Construction Technology, Procurement, Human Resources
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here