Fortifying management control of health, safety and productivity loss in South African construction

Emuze, F (2021) Fortifying management control of health, safety and productivity loss in South African construction. In: Scott, L and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 37th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-7 September 2021, Online Event, UK.

Abstract

This paper illustrates the paradox related to the tension between production and safety, which are competing elements. The study established the impact of unsafe health and safety practices on productivity in construction. A qualitative research approach was used to establish the relationship between health and safety practices and productivity loss. The 22 interviewees who answered both closed-ended and open-ended questions were active construction workers and professionals involved in projects at the time of data collection in South Africa. Based on the results of data analysis, a direct influence of health and safety on employees and their work practices was affirmed. For example, the results showed that poor health and safety practices at work lead to absenteeism resulting from illnesses and injuries. Poor health and safety practices, in turn, lead to a loss in productivity of the workforce. Cited instances show that work pressure leads to a lack of attention and concentration. Beyond compliance to legislation by the work crew, there is a case for reinforcing management controls on construction sites in the study area. Effective health and safety risk control and the steps of its deployment must be reinforced. Management controls would help contractors to remove the burden of hazard on a particular site by identifying what must be done and what gaps in the process are to be corrected. While the results from this study provide a reason to strengthen management control, the oversight should not be excessive to avoid unintended consequences.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction, health and safety, management control, productivity loss, site work
Index terms: construction site, productivity, illness, legislation, compliance, data analysis, injury, absenteeism, health and safety, unintended consequence, construction worker, South Africa, site work, paradox, health and safety practices, work practice, qualitative research
Subjects: occupational health and safety management, health conditions and diseases, Geography, health safety and environment, management, social theory and frameworks, data analysis and analytics, legal systems, site logistics, work location, practitioner, risk assessment, research design and methodology
Topics: Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Human Resources, Legal Issues, Site Management, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here