Harrington, S and Mulville, M (2021) A risk framework for the delivery of long-term performance through the large-scale energy focused retrofit of housing. In: Scott, L and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 37th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-7 September 2021, Online Event, UK.
Abstract
The 2019 Climate Action Plan (Ireland) seeks to retrofit approximately 500,000 existing homes to attain a B2 Building Energy Rating by 2030. Although not without merit, this presents‚ÄØa number of‚ÄØrisks.‚ÄØThe authors, through a review of relevant literature and a survey of leading experts in the field of domestic retrofit, set out to explore if and how the implementation, execution, and performance of retrofit strategies that utilise a uniform approach to the retrofit of the decidedly non-uniform existing dwelling stock could create un-intended consequences. It is demonstrated how issues related to indoor air quality, comfort and overheating may occur due to the narrow focus of housing retrofit on regulated energy. It also established that the application of theoretical modelling can affect dwelling performance. These issues could have significant health and wellbeing impacts on occupants and, furthermore, could be exacerbated by the impacts of climate change. The research incorporates a risk assessment which examined the interdependent factors, including areas that require further research, that present a risk in large-scale deep retrofit. The findings have implications for the policy framework. Without action, there is a risk that the retrofitted dwellings of today‚ÄØbecome the 'hard to treat' dwellings of the future.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | energy; housing; long-term performance; performance gap; retrofit; building fabric degradation; ventilation; overheating. |
| Index terms: | comfort, risk assessment, indoor air quality, performance gap, housing, retrofit strategy, climate change, Ireland, implementation, modelling, ventilation, survey, health and wellbeing, overheating, degradation |
| Subjects: | occupational health and safety management, environmental health, thermal systems, performance management, renovation and retrofit, financial risk, Geography, analytical methods, material degradation and durability, contractual arrangements, air quality, mental health and wellbeing, data collection methods, construction type, climate science |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Procurement, Sustainability, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here