Lost and found in translation: Top-down decoupling and bottom-up recoupling of strategies and practices in construction production

Kifokeris, D and Löwstedt, M (2021) Lost and found in translation: Top-down decoupling and bottom-up recoupling of strategies and practices in construction production. In: Scott, L and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 37th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-7 September 2021, Online Event, UK.

Abstract

Researchers have noted an apparent decoupling between construction production strategies formulated at upper management, and their top-down translation into on-site practices. In this paper, we revisit the research question of how and why there is such a decoupling and use that to conceptualise a primarily bottom-up schema of production strategizing, drawing on site managers' perspectives. As such, we conduct a Sweden-specific literature review focusing on (s) lean construction production practice variants, and (b) site managers' dispositions towards production strategy improvements imposed by upper organisational levels – which may not align with hands-on best practices. The findings show that production-oriented lean construction variants aiming at strategy or on-site processes may lack an interface altogether; furthermore, there exists a decoupling between the standardisation logic of the strategic top-down view of production, and site managers' tendency to act in free problem-solving roles. We then use the strategy as process and practice (SAPP) framework to integrate those findings and conceptualise a best practice-informed production strategising schema. This schema favors bottom-up production strategising, but also considers a loop-like collaboration approach – in an effort to integrate the benefits from a top-down production standardisation, with the flexible bottom-up buffer zones allowing for innovations and out-of-box solutions.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction production; site managers; lean construction; loose coupling; strategy-as-process-and-practice
Index terms: construction production, buffer, standardization, best practice, site manager, collaboration, decoupling, coupling, Sweden, drawing, literature review, strategy, lean construction, production strategy, site process
Subjects: data analysis and analytics, operations management, technical documentation, practitioner, business, systems engineering, building construction, Geography, financial risk, management, manufacturing engineering, performance measurement
Topics: Organizational Design, Site Management, Design Practice, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here