Energy and economic analysis of environmental upgrading of existing office buildings

Nguyen, D M; Ding, G and Runeson, G (2020) Energy and economic analysis of environmental upgrading of existing office buildings. Construction Economics and Building, 20(4), pp. 82-102. ISSN 2204-9029

Abstract

Over many decades, buildings have been recognised as a significant area contributing to the negative impacts on the environment over their lifecycle, accelerating climate change. In return, climate change also impacts on buildings with extreme heatwaves occurring more frequently and raising the earth’s temperature. The operation phase is the most extended period over a building’s lifespan. In this period, office buildings consume most energy and emit the highest amount of greenhouse gas pollution into the environment. Building upgrading to improve energy efficiency seems to be the best way to cut pollution as the existing building stock is massive. The paper presents an economic analysis of energy efficiency upgrade of buildings with a focus of office buildings. The paper identifies upgrading activities that are commonly undertaken to upgrade energy efficiency of office buildings and a case study of three office buildings in Sydney, Australia has been used to analyse the results. The upgrading activities can improve the energy performance of the case study buildings from 3 stars to 5 stars NABERS energy rating in compliance with the mandatory requirement in the Australian government’s energy policy. With the potential increase in energy price, energy efficiency upgrading will become more affordable, but currently, most of them, except solar panels and motion sensors show a negative return and would not be undertaken if they did not also contribute to higher rental income and an increased life span of the building. The upgrading discussed in the paper represent a potentially attractive alternative to demolition and building anew.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: energy upgrading; economic analysis; energy efficiency; existing office buildings; upgrading activities
Index terms: economic analysis, case study, lifespan, energy efficiency, pollution, office building, upgrading, energy policy, building stock, greenhouse gas, heatwave, energy performance, compliance, climate change, income, lifecycle, operation phase, Australia
Subjects: environmental health, asset management, strategic management, climate science, energy systems, economic analysis, project delivery, data collection methods, design analysis, health safety and environment, Geography, material degradation and durability, construction type, sustainability and energy, public policy
Topics: Health and Safety, Construction Materials, Governance, Design Practice, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Project Management, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here