Construction occupational safety and health incident reporting, recording, monitoring and management in Uganda

Ngobi, T G; Manga, M; Kibwami, N and Tutesigensi, A (2021) Construction occupational safety and health incident reporting, recording, monitoring and management in Uganda. In: Scott, L and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 37th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-7 September 2021, Online Event, UK.

Abstract

The construction industry is prone to many Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) incidents and responsible for high fatality of workers. Despite their high frequency and severity, construction incidents are usually underreported. The level of incident reporting is largely dependent on the nature of the reporting process. In this paper, we describe the current OSH incident recording, reporting, and management process in Uganda and identify weaknesses in the process that provide an opportunity for improvement, which could, ultimately, lead to better OSH performance. The research involved process modelling of the as-is/current process, based on content analysis of existing literature, and verification and analysis of the process model through interviews with OSH subject matter experts. The findings reveal that the current OSH incident, reporting recording, monitoring and management process is comprised of four sub-processes: Workplace Incident Reporting, Management, Recording and Compensation (WIRMR&C); Hospitisation (HOS); Incident Reporting to Police (IR2P) and National Incident Reporting, Management and Monitoring (NIRM&M). Several weaknesses such as: lack of centralized recording of construction OSH incidents; and lack of provisions for reporting minor OSH incidents at national level were identified. We suggest that these weaknesses should be addressed with a national web-based OSH incident recording, reporting and monitoring system.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction safety incidents; incident reporting; process modelling; Uganda
Index terms: content analysis, process modelling, interview, construction incident, Uganda, compensation, construction safety, incident reporting, construction industry, occupational safety and health, monitoring
Subjects: data collection methods, dispute resolution, control systems, design analysis, data analysis and analytics, health risk and incident analysis, Geography, financial risk, occupational health and safety management, industry analysis, environmental health
Topics: Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Sustainability, Design Practice, Legal Issues, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here