Attitudes towards using wood in the Danish building sector

Selman, A D; Heiselberg, H L and Gade, A N (2021) Attitudes towards using wood in the Danish building sector. In: Scott, L and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 37th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-7 September 2021, Online Event, UK.

Abstract

The Danish political strategy aims to reduce 70 % CO2 emissions by 2030. One way to achieve this goal is by choosing alternative building materials, particularly by using more wood in buildings. Research shows that wood is still not used broadly in the Danish building sector, compared to neighbouring countries, due to design traditions, legislation barriers, and lack of experiences and solutions. Thus, this study investigates the Danish construction sector’s current status and attitudes towards using wood in buildings, identifying the perceived barriers and benefits. A nationwide survey was collected from 155 respondents, including engineers, architects, municipalities, and professional building owners. The results indicate that actors have a positive mindset towards using wood and recognize its benefits, revealing that 15 % of actors use wood frequently in their projects, and 52 % are interested in this transition. However, numerous technical aspects must be solved, e.g., risk of fire and moisture. Building owners are the most prominent influencers to promote using wood and are responsible for progressing broader sustainability goals. Furthermore, a knowledge gap among designers was detected.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: wood; buildings; sustainability; attitudes
Index terms: designer, survey, mindset, wood, strategy, owner, engineer, CO2 emissions, legislation, municipality, construction sector, building material, architect
Subjects: sociology, industry analysis, administrative law, management, traditional and composite building materials, building materials, legal systems, profession, data collection methods, air quality, health behaviours and lifestyles
Topics: Design Practice, Legal Issues, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here