Weerasinghe, A S; Rasheed, E O and Rotimi, J O B (2021) A dilemma between building indoor environment preferences and occupant energy behaviours. In: Scott, L and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 37th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-7 September 2021, Online Event, UK.
Abstract
Often, building occupants compromise the energy savings of the building when they modulate their comfort through occupant behaviours. Therefore, this study identifies the relationships among indoor environmental conditions, comfort preferences, and occupant behaviours to improve future energy modelling works on occupant behaviour in buildings. A self-administered online questionnaire survey was conducted using a purposive sample of 46 occupants selected from five educational office buildings. Results show that the occupants' satisfaction with indoor environmental quality (IEQ), user-centred building controls, and furniture arrangements across the three office types: private, shared, and open-plan office has a similar value except for thermal comfort in winter and/or summer, ventilation in winter, acoustic comfort, and access to lighting control. The results also show the relationships of 17 occupant behaviours with 15 comfort preferences, where that highlights that the occupants were highly concerned about satisfying individual indoor air quality (IAQ) and thermal comforts through their behaviours rather than to save energy and follow management guidelines. Furthermore, IAQ and control over thermal and IAQ related parameters such as heating, cooling, and ventilation are highly correlated with the occupant behaviours, and these could be considered as primary predictors of occupant energy behaviours. These relationships of IEQ and user-centred building controls with occupant behaviours could be utilized to enhance future occupant energy behaviour modelling approaches and pinpoint the energy wasteful behaviours.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building controls; comfort; energy; indoor environment; occupant behaviours. |
| Index terms: | energy modelling, winter, satisfaction, lighting control, survey, ventilation, indoor environment, office building, indoor air quality, energy-saving, thermal comfort, comfort, questionnaire, summer, indoor environmental quality, preference, modelling, building control, occupant behaviour, environmental conditions |
| Subjects: | air quality, data collection methods, construction type, climate science, health behaviours and lifestyles, sustainability and energy, analytical methods, project delivery, environmental science, energy systems, decision-making and reasoning, energy efficiency, health safety and environment, occupational health and safety management, environmental health, environmental engineering |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here