Constraints to delivering low carbon buildings in high-rise high-density cities

Welege, N M H; Pan, W and Kumaraswamy, M M (2021) Constraints to delivering low carbon buildings in high-rise high-density cities. In: Scott, L and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 37th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-7 September 2021, Online Event, UK.

Abstract

Expected practical improvements in delivering low carbon buildings in high-rise high-density cities are still lagging behind those needed to meet global carbon reduction targets. This indicates that there could be a number of commonly prevalent constraints that hinder the delivery of low carbon buildings. Therefore, this paper aims to systematically identify and explore these constraints. The presented outcomes are based on a systematic literature review of published journal papers from 2001 to 2020 and the findings from a questionnaire survey covering seven cities in five contexts; namely, UAE (Dubai and Abu Dhabi), Qatar (Doha), Australia (Melbourne and Sydney), Singapore and Hong Kong. The systematic review led to the identification of 71 common constraints under 8 categories: namely, 'financial', 'market structure and supplies', 'policy and regulatory', 'knowledge, awareness and information', 'workforce and skills', 'technological', 'behavioural, social and cultural', and 'geographical and environmental'. While identifying the constraints common to the contexts of surveyed cities, the paper also presents the constraints specific to each context. The findings should assist decision making at both policy and project levels to accelerate the delivery of low carbon buildings by addressing and ameliorating the common constraints impeding their development in high-rise high-density cities.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: constraint; high-rise high-density city; low carbon building
Index terms: low-carbon building, systematic literature review, Dubai, Hong Kong, Qatar, journal, decision-making, density, survey, Australia, carbon reduction, Doha, questionnaire, Singapore
Subjects: research evaluation and metrics, Geography, decision analysis, research dissemination and communication, design practice, climate science, analytical methods, data collection methods
Topics: Design Practice, Urban Studies, Geographical Context, Risk Management, Research Practice, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here