Exploring the value in near miss reporting for construction safety

Williams, E; Sherratt, F and Norton, E (2021) Exploring the value in near miss reporting for construction safety. In: Scott, L and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 37th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-7 September 2021, Online Event, UK.

Abstract

Near miss reporting forms part of most contemporary Safety Management Systems across many industries, including construction. It is often seen as a leading indicator that demonstrates attention to safety through the vigilance and commitment of the workforce, the quantity of near misses raised often providing the measure of its value. Its prominence can be attributed to its positioning as the 'foundational layer' in Heinrich’s Accident Pyramid, although the causality also often ascribed therein is dubious. However, such reporting also brings problems of system misuse as a tool for blame, increased administrative burdens on safety professionals, and questions have been raised about the contribution such process actually bring to practice. Yet logic dictates that there should be some value in near miss reporting, however the process of reporting, including when and how reports are raised and what information is requested, will inevitably influence such value. A large database of near miss reports (n=3,519) submitted over two years to a UK civil engineering contractor has been analysed to reveal high level patterns within the data. Findings reveal a number of issues with the system and its data suggesting problems for both workers and safety managers, and reflecting problems also identified in other industries, and suggesting areas of focus for the development of a system able to overcome such problems in practice.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: accident causality; near miss reporting; safety; safety management
Index terms: safety management system, engineering contractor, safety management, construction safety, database, commitment, manager
Subjects: practitioner, psychology, health safety and environment, firms, environmental health, occupational health and safety management, data management
Topics: Health and Safety, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here